|
Content
|
| Quality : |
16.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
11.0 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
12.0 / 15 |
| Updates : |
9.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
2.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
53.0 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
8.0 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
13.5 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
3.0 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
6.5 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria
|
|
|
1. Scene & cumshot variety.
2. Good content quality.
3. Very low price.
1. Non-exclusive content.
2. Studio syle posed pics.
3. Many upsell links.
"Cum Academy has quite a mix of cumshot & hardcore action although it is non-original material." |
|
|
As the title Cum Academy implies this is blend of a couple niches: cumshot and teen. The tour kind of pushes this concept to the edge by stating "real amateurs taking their first loads" and similar slogans. Notwithstanding those exaggerations the content does indeed have all cumshot focused material with hot mostly hot models.
The Goods.
- Scene & Cumshot Variety. After browsing the picture and video sections I felt that one of the real strengths is the mix collection they have to offer. Shoots vary in number of performers with some one-on-one scenes and group banging too. The groups are sometimes several girls and one dude and other times its multiple dudes and one girl. The cumshots are a mixed bag too with oral, swallowing, and body shots.
- Good Content Quality. Both the pictures and videos look nice. It's not the most consistent in the world with some bits of content being lesser quality than others but overall I see it as a positive.
- Very Low Price. The normal price these guys charge is already low but they've gone one step further and set up an ultra-cheap price for TBP users. As always this helps out in the value score.
The Bads.
- Many More Pictures than Videos. They really need to get some more balance here by increasing the number of videos. This is especially true since they're so quick on the guest tour to advertise their dvd quality movies. I only like to see pictures dominate sites when they're in the softcore niche. For a cumshot site like Cum Academy surfers really want videos.
- Posed Studio Style Pics. This is just what you rely on picture galleries for hardcore action. The sex didn't seem very hot and exciting. Instead they looked more posed to get the right shot and angle for each stage of the banging.
- Many Upsells. There's links to everything in here from penis growth stuff to sex guides to other paysites. Even though they're not overly intrusive there's just a whole boat-load of them.
Conclusion:
It's so rare nowadays when I review a site in a hardcore niche like cumshot and the content is mostly pictures. That's definitely the #1 thing that stood out. So long as you're into picture content then the site is pretty good, I'm just not sure how wide of an audience that is.
| 1st Follow-Up Review |
Review: 02-13-07 |
Cum Academy continues to update with one new picture gallery daily plus one new video every 5 days. I don't see any changes to the site infrastructure or concept. It seems to be going along as it was at the time of our initial review except there is more overall content. Looking over the content again I should note that the scenes are general hardcore shoots with good cumshot finishes so the action is more than just cumshots
Score decreased from 74.4 to 74.0.
| 2nd Follow-Up Review |
Review: 06-22-09 |
This is TBP’s third look at Cum Academy and this company tends to keep things steady without many changes for this site as well as the others in the network. Both the navigation and content have the same foundation with a collection of non-original photo galleries and videos that often focus on cumshots and other times are more general hardcore in nature. The low monthly price and included network still stand out as important selling points since the content is such a mixed bag. My overall score and analysis of Cum Academy has not changed and my main Good/Bad bullet points still apply.
Score remains at 74.0.
|
