|
Content
|
| Quality : |
18.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
11.5 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
13.0 / 15 |
| Updates : |
7.5 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
5.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
57.5 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
8.5 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
14.5 / 20 |
| Other |
| Temp Fill : |
8.0 / 10 |
| sub-total : |
8.0 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
| Editor: Spencer |
Initial Review: 02-09-05 |
|
1. All exclusive material.
2. Photos are quite interesting, and look nice.
1. No videos.
2. A bit expensive.
"A good site for some interesting photography, though some will miss videos & extras." |
|
|
Site titles are really fooling me lately, or my instinct is just off or something. I thought Crazy Babe would be about an amateur who does severe hardcore or something. It's actually a multi-model site that is a bit different than what I'm used to seeing. Browsing around trying to get a feeling of what the site is all about, everything is just a bit different than expected. Galleries have covers, though it doesn't really look like a magazine or anything, and galleries feature unique content and are HUGE (20-50+ pages with 21 pics per page on average).
$30 will get you into the site, which is on the high end but not too horrible. The models are listed right on the main member's page, and I counted 107 online right now. Back in 2000, it seems they added one new girl (which means one new set) a month. They did this all the way through 2003, but in January 2004 it appears we now get something new each week.
Once you pick a gallery/model, you're taken to what is usually quite the intricate page. It looks to be an image, with some text spray painted on a wall (or added to other random place on the image) somewhere that leads you to the important stuff. The "cover" link is just another photo with a "guest" and "member" link that both seem to lead to the same place. I don't really understand why it's there. Second is the "index" link which takes you back to the main member's page. The third link takes you to the actual gallery. While I guess it's a nice intro to that gallery, it seems like a lot of extra clicking to me.
The pictures here are quite interesting, most probably because this seems to be a site by a photographer. After checking out some galleries, I don't think there are really any vertical pictures here. Check it out, most are horizontal! The colors and subject matter are usually pretty interesting. There's not much real hardcore per se; I didn't see very many sets with more than one person in them, and you don't even get as much as playing/masturbation at times. However, there are spread lips and peeing here and there, so it's not totally tame. The pictures are a decent size at 1000x667 across the board (till you get to the older sets, which are still 1024x768 so pretty similar). Quality is pretty good as well, with no real complaints on my end. If you look real close, you might see a couple familiar faces from other reviews of ours.
The site has some extras in the way of more content, and some links to plugins as well. There are no videos that belong to this site, which is something major that's missing compared to most sites. The other thing I'd like to see is maybe some info on the models, or the shoots, or something. Some early sets have an interview of sorts, but for the most part you're stuck figuring things out by looking at the content. They do have a trial at $10 for seven days, which may not be a bad idea if you're not sure if you'd be interested at such a high price. It's definitely not the norm for today's type sites, but if you're looking for something unique and a little more interesting it might work for you.
|
