|
Content
|
| Quality : |
14.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
12.0 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
12.0 / 15 |
| Updates : |
6.5 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
5.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
52.0 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
7.5 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
13.5 / 20 |
| Other |
| Temp Fill : |
7.3 / 10 |
| sub-total : |
7.3 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
| Editor: Spencer |
Initial Review: 04-17-05 |
|
1. The basics are all covered.
2. Not too expensive.
3. Decent number of photo sets up.
1. Updates can be erratic.
2. Video quality is all over the place.
3. Needs a little more interaction.
"Not a bad site here really, but it just doesn't jump out at me as a must-see." |
|
|
When amateurs make up their cute little names, sometimes it can give you an insight into what they're all about (while other times it's pretty worthless). Thankfully, Corina Curves is pretty spot-on here. She's a tiny 5'1" tall, but has whopping 34F boobs hanging off her petite frame. I can't imagine at her size those things are real, but who cares! Taking a look at her bio, it seems she's a semi-pro of sorts, having done magazine shoots with Hustler, Score, and more. Her and her husband, Dicky, are mild swingers (if there is such a thing), so hopefully we can get some decent hardcore action on the site here.
At $20 a month, the cost is pretty standard for an amateur site. The site and design look pretty good, with a simple menu on the left guiding you where you need to go. I hit her pictures link first, when then takes you to a page where you need to decide what category to head into. There's actually a good number of sets to check out here it seems. The pictures are all pretty much as expected, with the sizes averaging around 800x600. Indoor sets vary quite a bit in quality, depending on the lighting mostly. Outdoor sets generally look nicer with the sunlight helping a lot.
The videos aren't categorized like the photos are, which can be a good or bad thing depending on your tastes. They're just presented in a list format, usually broken up into clips (though each clip is a separate update it seems) in one Windows Media Video format only. Quality varies a ton, and I can't quite figure it out here. Their newest page and clips look pretty bad at 320x240 and only 100-150kbps. Older ones can get up to 350-500kbps and look a lot better. Why the change? Overall, the ones shot on her own look a bit amateur overall, suffering only the same problems you'd see in her pictures area - poor lighting mostly. The camera could also play a part, making the picture a bit fuzzier than normal here and there.
She does have a message board, though it's not real active with only 11 posts total right now (on a side note, she posted some pretty personal stuff today about a medical problem she's having - we wish her the best with a speedy recovery). She also aims for one or two weekly cam shows it seems, but only has a schedule up for past days (with nothing scheduled right now in the future). There's some extra content here and there to check out as well.
Overall, the site is decent I guess. Updates are erratic at times, but in general there's usually something coming every week or so (sometimes it's not a Corina update though). Quality is just okay across the board, and that could be improved a bit. Mostly, though, I'd like to see updates get more consistent, and more interaction in her message board (or by adding a journal or something). The site blends in to the rest a bit for me right now, with nothing really standing out either way.
|
