|
Content
|
| Quality : |
14.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
12.5 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
14.5 / 15 |
| Updates : |
5.5 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
5.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
2.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
53.5 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
6.0 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.0 / 05 |
| Design : |
2.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
10.0 / 20 |
| Other |
| Temp Fill : |
7.1 / 10 |
| sub-total : |
7.1 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
| Editor: Vanessa |
Initial Review: 05-09-04 |
|
1. Entertaining videos.
2. Some hot chicks.
1. Lack of site design & navigation.
2. Expensive.
"He can pimp the hoes but not the code, this site is in need of a re-design!" |
|
|
A porn site endorsed by Howard Stern is a porn site that I can appreciate! However, Howard Stern is no where near as Internet porn savvy as I am (just had to yank my own chain a little bit there)! CaliforniaPimp.com is a reality-based site that focuses on luring unexpecting girls into shooting videos of a pornographic nature by first telling them that they are there for a calendar ad photo shoot. With the camera in hand, you won't believe what some of these girls are willing to do in front of the camera. Fake or not, this is some entertaining porn that they've got here. The lack in site design is only mildly discouraging and the time spent watching various video clips with wash those concerns away quickly. The price of admission is not cheap either, though, at $29.80/month you've got to wonder if these guys are in it for the long run or are they out for a quick fix like a lot of indifferent porn subscribers out there.
The site design is about as amateur and inconsistent as you can get! I couldn't even figure out how to get back to the main menu page, in fact, I'm not even certain that you can! Of course there's a link to the members home, but that just takes you to the mish-mash of things that I would consider the updates page. The content is separated into 5, 6 month to a year long period sections by date: Jun '00 - Dec '00; Jan '01 - June '01; Jul '01 - Dec '02; Jan '03 - Dec '03; Jan '04 - present, as well as a punk rock girls section that sites all to itself (there are only 2 girls in this section). In any case, there's no real uniformity here and it's rather annoying! The only consistency you'll find here is that almost all videos are offered in high speed (350-600k) and modem (56k) connection formats, while some are only offered as high speed (350k). And though it changes from video to video, most are offered in Real Player (streaming) or MPG download formats. The quality is about average to above and I think it's safe to say that only true draw to this site rests in the actual content within the videos.
And so it is, if you're in for a real treat, check out Audra (Aug '03), she's got the best set of tits and nice round asses that you'll ever see. The camera man and his side kick (David) are a couple of jack asses! They lour these chicks in through newspaper ads that say they are looking for some "calendar girls". Believe it or not, it wont matter since most girls play it off in a convincingly manner that allows you to get lost in the fantasy either way. And oddly enough, a lot of the videos are 'the return of...' so and so, especially nowadays. Has the modeling agency lost its drive to find new and "unexpecting" girls? I should hope not! In any case, they always start at the feet (nice shoes) and you will never see the faces behind the camera, only their cocks as these "naughty calendar girls" suck them off in front of the camera. The shy and unexpecting Audra turns into a whore in the bed and even licks David’s' ass when he tells her to. Pose, say some lines ("I'm a naughty calendar girl"), get on your knees, turn into a naughty whore. Either way it goes, these guys get the "models" naked and having sex on tape. Girl-girl, boy-girl, it's all here and it's all very entertaining.
So what have we learned today? If anything, it's that the guys over at CaliforniaPimp.com (who are associated with the infamous Bangbus, by the way), obviously know how to produce some entertaining content! Where they go wrong is in the lack of scheduled updates and site design. These guys may not know how to write code, but they sure do know how to produce some good porn, I'll give them that much. They've got the edge that it takes, the edge that drives these little amateur sluts naked and crazy, and I like that! There's certainly a fair amount of content to go through here and plenty of giggles, jerks, and perks to be had as well. Browsing the site might prove to be frustrating and so might viewing the content every now and then. I did have some troubles viewing a few of the videos, unfortunately. Overall, it's hard to justify this site at almost $30 bucks a month. They need a better site design and continuous updates of higher quality content for me to change my mind on this one. If the entertainment value of a site is the most important factor when choosing your porn, then I'd say check things out. There's nothing wrong with joining a site for a month and then canceling before the rebill date.
|
