OFFICIAL
78.0
pretty good |
|
Content
|
| Quality : |
17.5 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
12.5 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
12.5 / 15 |
| Updates : |
7.5 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
5.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
58.0 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
8.0 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
13.5 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
3.0 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
5.5 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria
|
|
| Editor: Vanessa |
Initial Review: 05-06-08 |
|
1. Quality looks good.
2. Network access.
3. Consistent weekly updates.
4. Full-length videos.
1. No model index or bios.
2. No content descriptions or information.
3. Browse options are limited.
4. Not true HD quality.
"A simple site lacking personality, but Network access adds to the value." |
|
|
BustySolos.com is a big-tit, hot-chick site with sexy amateur babes in high quality masturbation shoots. Currently there are 52+ videos and 123+ photosets. New updates are added weekly and your $29.99 monthly membership also gives access to another 28+ sites thanks to Network affiliations. Some of the girls had bigger boobs than others, but these aren't all big naturals, so expect to see some busty implants throughout as well.
The Good:
- Multi-site access comes with your membership to Busty Solos, which on its own has quite a bit of content as well. True to the theme, you will find some sexy glamour chicks and amateurs with nice breasts having sex with fingers and toys.
- New updates are added weekly & consistently. Although a big majority of the content at this point is image galleries, videos seem to be the standard update at this point.
- Full-length video downloads. Videos are offered as full-length files in QuickTime and WMV formats. Newest videos have bitrates up to 2000k with a nice quality picture & sound. Image quality also looks great, although I wish they offered the option for larger size formats.
The Bad:
- No model index, bios or content information. Basically this is a content-only site and lack of model or content information lends to the impersonal feel.
- Browse options are limited. Image sets and videos are listed separately without any sort of search feature, content categories, or additional browse options. No zip file downloads are offered for the photo galleries.
- Videos are labeled as HD, and although they look good, they are not truly HD quality. Bitrates speeds could be higher and image sizing could be larger all around.
The Conclusion:
Busty Solos is an average site I'd say. It probably won't leave much of an impression, good or bad. The overall quality and consistency was nice, but lack of model/content information kept me from really being drawn in. Even if they simply offered the basics in terms of content/model information, then users could browse by breast size, natural/implants, body type, etc. I probably wouldn't pay $30 bucks for this site alone, but admittedly Network access does make a membership more appealing.
|
