|
Content
|
| Quality : |
15.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
12.0 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
11.5 / 15 |
| Updates : |
8.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
4.5 / 05 |
| Download : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
54.5 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
8.0 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
2.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
12.5 / 20 |
| Other |
| Temp Fill : |
7.4 / 10 |
| sub-total : |
7.4 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
| Editor: Duke |
Initial Review: 08-28-03 |
| Follow-Up Review(s): 08-18-05 |
|
1. Original amateurs.
2. Big boobed amateurs.
1. Small video section.
2. Average size pics.
"Good looking amateur models featured in average quality content." |
|
|
Busty2's motto is "Busty models with beautiful boobs". That's pretty much what's here, a collection of picture sets with the focus on girls with big hooters. It's a San Diego based company and among the content are some recognizable models and others who were new to me. Like other amateur model sites, the pictures and videos here are all orginal. The chicks found here are pretty hot and they do have big boobs. I've seen better babes but I've also seen much much uglier.
The exclusive content and boob niche are the two strongest things Busty2 has going for it. Other aspects of the site really seem lacking in comparison to similar model sites out there. First, the picture quality and resolution was disapointing. Most are about the same quality you'd find on many free sites. There's some grainyness to the pics that shouldn't be there. An average pic here has a size of about 600x800, which is pretty weak for a paysite. Many other sites offer the ability to view pics in multiple sizes, but that's not available on Busty2. Mostly the photo sets are of solo girls undressing and showing off their bods. A little bit of toy play, hardcore, and lesbian is available, but that's only a relatively small percentage. These niche galleries are actually separated out into their own sections. Browsing those lets you see just how little hardcore there actually is.
Aside from the video section being small (34 models have vids), I liked them better than the pictures. The quality is better and most available for downloading in multiple file sizes and formats (Windows Media or Quicktime). I watched them on full screen mode in Windows Media Player and there's only a bit of grainyness at that size. Six sets of hardcore videos are available with the focus on tit sex and blowjobs. Those are pretty good considering it's amateur action and not professional movies.
The site updates every weekday. Typically it includes a new photo set or video series. Update archives do go back to August 2001 when the site opened. That's probably not the best way to browse the site though, navigating through the alphabatized model index is much easier. The $24.99/mo price is to be expected for a site like this. The trial is not too impressive though, 4-days for $8.99. That would be more tolerable if it were around $3.99.
| 1st Follow-Up Review |
Review: 08-18-05 |
A lot of time has passed between my initial review and this follow up, it's been just about two years. Even so it didn't take long for me to remember the site. That's especially true since not very much has changed. Content has been added although the videos section is roughly the same size; it's only grown by about a dozen videos. One thing I didn't write about last time was the design. I find the navigation to be kind of choppy and I don't like that there are no preview thumbs of the videos. The picture quality has stayed steady as well which means it's not up to par when compared to today's hi-resolution photography sites. Exclusive content remains the biggest strength but as you can probably tell I still feel there's room for improvement in other areas. These scores have changed: Quality +0.5, Download -1, and Value +0.5.
Score remains at 74.4.
|
