|
Content
|
| Quality : |
17.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
13.5 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
12.5 / 15 |
| Updates : |
8.5 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
5.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
59.0 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
8.0 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.0 / 05 |
| Design : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
13.0 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
4.0 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
7.5 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
|
1. Not too expensive.
2. Decent update schedule.
3. Content looks good all around.
1. No full-video options.
2. Some navigation features could be added.
3. Video downloads were slow for me.
"Even though the content doesn't interest me, the site's pretty good!" |
|
|
When thinking of sites that are ultra-niched out, shemales often come to mind. They don't quite fit in with the gay sites, and they definitely don't fit in with the straight sites either. Now, it seems tranny sites even have further sub-niches available. Take, for instance, Brazilian Shemale Club, which is our review for the day. Perhaps Brazil has a high ratio of "girly men," or perhaps the webmaster was just sick of the normal shemales you see all over.
The site has an odd price of $23 a month, which I guess is about right in the middle. The layout and look of the site is very simple and easy to get around, but it won't be winning any design contests. Pick one of their latest updates, or browse through the model or video pages and you're on your way.
Picking a girl in their models section takes you to a photo gallery of hers. I wish they had a link to any videos she has as well to make finding content from a girl easier. There were a lot more solo galleries than I was expecting, and they definitely make up the majority. Getting around the galleries is pretty simple, except the first page doesn't contain links to jump to different pages (although they are available on every other page - very weird). Pictures open up in a new, sized window. The pictures look pretty standard and are amateur in nature. They usually end up at 800x600 unless you're looking at the older stuff. They are well-lit and look decent though.
Watching the videos is a little more confusing. You pick a model, just like you did before, and they just give you text links for viewing the clips. There's no full-video download available. The clips are offered in Real Video and DivX format only, with DivX obviously looking a lot better. The Real Video clips actually don't look all that bad at 250kbps if you ask me, but it is slightly more painful to watch that version. The DivX are way up at 2300kbps, although they don't quite look THAT good. Full-screen looks decent with just some small picture-quality issues present. You get to see lots of she-dudes masturbating here in full-screen glory. There's some hardcore action as well, but not like you see on reality sites these days.
Overall, the site is simple but decent. The content looks pretty good all around, which is what counts most. They post something new every three days, although for some reason they don't link the update notices to the gallery. That along with other small problems makes me feel that they could update the navigation a bit. They could also use some more video preview and download options (full video, clip preview pics, etc.), as well as zip files for the photos if they want to get real fancy. Still, the content is exclusive, and they provide a good amount for the price.
| 1st Follow-Up Review |
Review: 09-11-05 |
Well, things look pretty much the same around here from what I remember. Updates are still coming along, and the content looks pretty good still. The price took a bit of a hit to $25 a month. I also checked out the video section to see if anything was updated there, and they did change their Real Videos over to Windows Media Videos (which are better), but still no full-scene downloads like I had hoped. On top of that, the download speeds were awful here this time around, coming in around 90KB/sec. (whereas most are around 600-700KB/sec. for me). This meant a small clip took eight minutes or so for me which is just too slow.
The download problem could be temporary (or a glitch between us and them), so I won't hold it against them too much. Otherwise, my score still stands pretty much from what you saw last time. Definitely worth a look, though there is a little room for improvement still.
Score remains at 80.0.
|
