OFFICIAL
78.0
pretty good |
|
Content
|
| Quality : |
17.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
11.5 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
13.0 / 15 |
| Updates : |
6.5 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
5.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
56.0 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
8.0 / 10 |
| Features : |
3.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
15.0 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
3.5 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
7.0 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
| Editor: Spencer |
Initial Review: 01-14-08 |
|
1. Exclusive gay content.
2. A few different ways to browse.
1. Updates can be erratic.
2. I thought videos could look better.
3. Latest scenes have no descriptions.
"An okay collection here that was good, but didn't stand out a ton for me." |
|
|
Boys Love 18 is obviously a gay site, and they focus on these guy's first time on camera, and supposedly being tricked into doing crazy stuff on camera. The content on the tour looks European, abut also over-airbrushed. Let's home the latter is just a tour problem, and not a content problem inside. They're part of the Teen Mega World network, which means you get access to several other sites (most of which aren't gay) for your $25 membership fee.
The goods:
- Exclusive gay content. The theme here was a little all over the place, with some scenes having grandpas in them, and other keeping the guys around 20, but at least the content is all exclusive.
- A few different ways to browse. Their main archive link allows you to view the scenes by model, rating, or chronologically which is better than most. About the only thing missing I wish they had was a model's index to see all the guy's faces in one place.
The bads:
- Updates can be erratic. Generally they come weekly, but if you look over the past couple months, they can skip a week or two at times which isn't good. The site isn't small, but it isn't large either, so consistent updates would really help the growth.
- I thought videos could look better. The didn't look bad at all, but with the awesome specs they throw out for the WMV videos they offer, I was surprised they weren't as clear as possible for some reason.
- Latest scenes have no description. I'm not sure if it's a temporary thing or what, but when you first start browsing the videos, there are no recent descriptions which doesn't make the site look good for first impressions.
Conclusion:
Overall, it's a pretty average site for me. The exclusive gay content is nice to have, and they usually are updating weekly. They just didn't really stand out anywhere as awesome in any areas, so I don't think I'll remember them much down the road. Some growth, better quality, regular updates, or anything else unique would definitely help, though they have a decent collection as it is at least.
|
