|
Content
|
| Quality : |
15.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
12.0 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
12.5 / 15 |
| Updates : |
7.5 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
3.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
52.5 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
7.5 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
13.0 / 20 |
| Other |
| Temp Fill : |
7.3 / 10 |
| sub-total : |
7.3 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
| Editor: Spencer |
Initial Review: 02-04-06 |
|
1. Updates come pretty often.
2. Quality can be okay.
1. Quality varies a lot.
2. Design and navigation could be better.
3. Updates can be erratic sometimes.
"A pretty mixed reaction from me here, with some issues that need resolving." |
|
|
Okay I get how these girls are bound up by ropes, ties, clamps, etc., but what are they determined to do exactly? BoundnDetermined has to be some kind of cool bondage site based just on the name itself. You can get a good idea of what they're all about by browsing through the tour, which is basically a collection of small sample photos. Becoming a member isn't too bad at $20 a month, so I think it's time to jump inside and see what they have to offer exactly.
The member's area (which looks similar to their tour) looks okay but isn't anything great. It's mostly text-based, and could use a little refresher if you ask me. They don't seem to mess with much in the way of extras, as the link to their store is the only one that's not content-related. To get to the good stuff, you basically pick a year and start browsing away.
I headed to 2005 to get a good idea of what they've been doing recently, with the added benefit of checking out their update schedule over a long period. Updates seem to come once a week (or more), though the timing of it all can be very erratic (some coming every day for a while, others taking a month or so).
As far as the content goes, it's a wide variety here overall. They're definitely not all shot by the same crew (unless they mix in a bunch of older content as well), as most of the scenes look quite different from each other. Some sets have large, nice-looking pics at 1024x768 or so, while others have older, off-color small pics at 700x500 or so; you'll also find most everything in between as well of course. Sometimes they even seem to purposefully downsize their images in the browser for some reason, which makes no sense at all to me.
Videos are in their own section, and then divided up into 2006 clips, 2005 clips, and 2002-2004 clips. Something new seems to be put up at least every week here as well. The newest offer two Windows Media Video options, and specs seem to vary from one clip to the next (older stuff has just one quality option that's much lower). 320x240 and 220kbps was the norm, while newer stuff is 640x480 and 500-1500kbps. The really old stuff is in Real Video, and I wouldn't recommend most of their videos as the quality just isn't there. The newest stuff is better, but there's hardly any of that. They also add videos from other sites here and there which is a strange practice.
So otherwise, there's not much else to see. This site is okay, but could use some improvements. Quality could be better, and definitely could be more consistent. Updates are the same - they work as they are now, but could be more consistent and better in the end.
|
