|
Content
|
| Quality : |
16.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
11.0 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
12.0 / 15 |
| Updates : |
7.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
3.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
51.5 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
7.5 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.0 / 05 |
| Design : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
12.5 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
3.5 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
7.0 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
| Editor: Spencer |
Initial Review: 12-01-04 |
|
1. Nice network of sites included.
2. Some videos look good.
1. Hard to get around.
2. Site is pretty small on its own.
3. A bit expensive.
"Make your trip to Blowjob Quickie a quick one, as there's not much to see." |
|
|
Can I get an 'amen' to this? More women in life should consider Blowjob Quickies as a way to please their men. In fact I'm going home and showing my wife this one tonight in hopes it inspires her a bit. Actually, Blowjob Quickies is part of the Meat Members network, which means it could have some decent content. Plus, your (expensive $34) membership gets you access to all the rest of the sites which is a nice bonus.
Getting in is a bit of a pain, as you first go to the network homepage and have to find the link to Blowjob Quickies specifically. Not only that, but you have to enter you login information which is another pain. The actual member's area is setup pretty standard, if not a little plain. They jump right in listing their galleries without many extras. Getting through the galleries is also a pain since all you have is a "next" link without any idea of how many pages there are. Only five are listed per page, and when all is said and done now you have just under 30 scenes available - it's not very big at all.
Pictures come in the form of vidcaps, which are a big bore compared to their video counterparts. They are fine for what they are at 640x480, but unless you can't decide which video to watch, I can't see much of a use for them.
Videos come in either one-part or three-part (depending on the scene) Windows Media and MPG videos (which also have two quality options if they have three parts - quite confusing I must say). Those that have just one option are in between the others. That basically gives you either 350kbps to 700kbps depending what the scene offers (they all vary a lot, even if you think they'd be the same). Quality ranges from decent, to barely okay. It pretty much follows the encoding quality the video uses. I saw three different URL's on each of the first three clips I watched, which was a bit disturbing. I would assume this stuff is exclusive, but by the looks of it it may be on a few other sites as well.
The site overall to me is just pretty plain. The main draw would have to be the network access you get, as this site on its own just wouldn't hold my attention very long. The videos are fine, but there aren't very many of them, and they aren't anything new or exciting. The only date I see is the "last updated" date, which is over a week ago now. I also wouldn't mind seeing more consistency in the video options and quality. It's fine I guess, but I don't think I'd wanna join this for that price on its own.
|
