|
Content
|
| Quality : |
17.5 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
15.0 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
14.0 / 15 |
| Updates : |
9.5 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
5.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
63.5 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
7.0 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
12.0 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
3.0 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
5.5 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
|
1. Both hardcore and softcore content.
2. Quality is mostly good (newest content).
3. Consistent updates.
4. A large archive of content.
1. No search features.
2. No full-length video dowloads/streams.
3. Site design & navigation needs work.
4. Image size and quality is inconsistent.
"A large collection of Fun gay content, although a re-design would make your experience here more pleasurable." |
|
|
BF Collection.com is the home of the Boy Fun Collection, a site made up of over 270,000+ images and 845+ videos featuring young Boy's having Fun sex. They claim that their "exclusive photographers shoot what you want the way you want it", but I have a really hard time believing that everything you see here is exclusive to the site. Without going into too much detail at this point, I think it's safe to say that the site design and navigation here could use some serious work, especially with the amount of content here, but what is nice is that updates can be expected quite often; something to the tune of every other day in fact. A model index has recently been added in order to make finding your perfect Boyfun model (1,000's) that much easier and the price of entry is set at $29.99 per month, which isn't too unreasonable considering the large amount of gay content that you'll find here.
When I say that the site design could use some work, I say that because there's just way too much text linking going on for a site this large. While the content is broken down into 3 main sections: hardcore galleries, movie galleries and softcore galleries, each section has anywhere from 30-60+ galleries within it and then furthermore, each gallery can have up to 10+ more categories: teens, amateurs, ethnics, outdoors, teens 2, action sets, etc. But it doesn't stop there, each of those gallery sections then breaks down the content even more by model...it's just too much, too much clicking around, too much linking, too much getting lost without really knowing where you're going to end up and what you're going to end up with. I do like that they've added a model index to make searching by certain types of young men easier but the whole navigational design here really needs to be simplified much, much more. Even if the BF team doesn't want to go through the mess of re-building the site they could at least offer a search feature that allows members to find specific types of content such as ass rimming, anal, 3somes, hairy, big cocks, teens, you get the idea.
Okay, so I've made my piece about the navigational issue so now it's on to the content. There's just so much of it here so it comes as no surprise that there's a lacking in the consistency department. Image sizes can range from way too small for a paysite, to something closer to your average paysite image size (1024x682 pixels) and the quality follows to the same tune. There's an enormous mix of both hardcore and softcore content here ranging from simple spreads to hot sex action with full-fledged follow throughs, etc. All image sets are offered as a zip file, which is nice and other than the inconsistency in quality/lack of ease of navigating it, I'd say there's a little something here for every one (unless you're looking for straight boy-girl sex, that is:).
The movie gallery lists videos similar to how the image sets are arranged and to date there are over 145+ text linked movie galleries. Each of them has 4 videos, which are broken down into clips (1-4+ usually). These videos are labeled "homegrown", which I am assuming refers to the fact that they're exclusive? Either way, it's sort-of a crap shoot at what you can expect from these since they aren't really labeled or categorized in any particular way but I can tell you that you're going to see a lot of masturbation, sex, 3somes, blowjobs and more. The quality is pretty good streaming from 700-1000k and, in my opinion, they're some of the best content here. I would love if they added full-length file streams/downloads for them as well as integrating them somehow into a search feature so members can see all the action they desire. I think it's clear that this site could really benefit greatly from a re-deign which makes browsing the enormous archive of content a lot easier than it is now. And while the collection of content ranges in quality; it does look as though it has gotten consistently better over time, which is nice. I can't honestly say how much of the content here is truly exclusive but there is a massive amount of it and with by tackling some of their navigational issues, BF Collection could easily be one of the best resources for Boy sex Fun.
| 1st Follow-Up Review |
Review: 12-06-06 |
It's been over a year and we're back again at this fun gay site, BF Collection and it looks as though they've kept consistent with updates too, offering multiple updates (4) every other day. Since we've been here last the total number of images has grown to over 348,000+ and the number of videos is up over 663+. This is just one huge collection of content and I'm still wishing for some sort of search feature here!! I'm not completely certain if they've changed much at all when it comes to browsing the content, but I do see preview images for the videos now and streaming quality is up to about 1400k (still no full-length scenes, however). They could still go just a bit larger with the images but overall I'm really loving the quality here. $29.95 might have been somewhat expensive for this site before, but now it's about right. I just hope the next time we're here they've got some sort of advanced search feature worked out.
Score increased from 82.4 to 83.5.
|
