OFFICIAL
78.0
pretty good |
|
Content
|
| Quality : |
15.5 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
13.5 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
13.0 / 15 |
| Updates : |
7.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
3.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
55.5 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
8.0 / 10 |
| Features : |
3.0 / 05 |
| Design : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
14.0 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
4.0 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
7.5 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria
|
|
| Editor: Duke |
Initial Review: 09-26-06 |
| Follow-Up Review(s): 11-19-08 |
|
1. Model index & 30s/40s/50s sections.
2. Real & avg looking mature women.
3. Lots of picture galleries.
1. Basic member's area design.
2. Tons more pics than videos.
3. Lower video quality.
"A large collection of mature photo galleries but the videos section and design could use work." |
|
|
With a title like Aunt Judy's I was half expecting this to be a solo amateur site. That's not the case at all. Aunt Judy's is a general mature site featuring content of models over 30 and up to and beyond 60 years old. The best way for a guest to get acquainted with the women they offer is the model index which can be browsed on the tour. There are only small thumbnail face pics of the models but it provides pretty good insight into the women in their collection.
The Goods:
- Lots of Picture Galleries. The galleries make up the vast majority of the content and there are thousands of them. For the most part the picture quality is average although there is a section called "reprocessed galleries" that have a decent number of galleries featuring larger and better looking pics.
- Real & Avg Looking Mature Women. Aunt Judy's is for surfers who go for everyday average looking mature women. A lot of mature/milf sites I've reviewed only have plastic-like aging pornstars but that's not the case here. Most of the action is of women stripping and posing solo. This collection is for softcore fans.
- Model Index & 30s/40s/50s+ Sections. With so many galleries the model index is helpful for browsing and although they have a number of browsing categories I think the separate sections for 30s, 40s, and 50s are the most useful.
The Bads:
- Tons More Pics than Videos. The videos section is so dwarfed by the number of picture galleries that it is the biggest drawback of the site.
- Basic Member's Area Design. The layout relies on a lot of simple text. Although I pointed to the model index and age categories in my 'goods' there's still a lot of room for improvement when it comes to design. For instance the main member's page requires a lot of scrolling.
- Low Video Quality. As you can tell I see the video collection as something that needs improving. The vids are offered in WMV and MPEG clips both of which are rather grainy. Solo masturbation and toy play is what's featured in most of the movies.
Conclusion:
It's tough to get a read on the updates since they have only three listed under their "recent updates" section. The target surfer would be somebody who wants softcore photo content of real "normal" looking mature women.
| 1st Follow-Up Review |
Review: 11-19-08 |
A couple years have passed since TBP did our initial review of Aunt Judy's. Taking a look around the site I can see that the bullet points from my initial review still apply as the foundation of the site has held steady. Still, there are a few things to report on like the continued updates which have made the picture collection even larger. It really is a great sized number of galleries that covers amateur mature from ladies in their 30's to 60's. My initial review references categorization by age (Over 30, Over 40, Over 50) but I should also note they have other filters like Big Tits, Full Bush, BBW, Trailer Trash, Stockings, MILFs, and Big Tits & Asses. Updates continue to the videos as well although at a much slower pace that the pictures and that section remains much smaller in number than the picture galleries. My overall rating is going to rise a bit since Aunt Judy's is a solid Mature/Milf niche site for those looking for softcore style content with amateur models.
Score increased from 74.5 to 78.0.
|
