OFFICIAL
79.9
pretty good |
|
Content
|
| Quality : |
16.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
12.5 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
12.0 / 15 |
| Updates : |
7.5 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
4.5 / 05 |
| Download : |
4.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
56.5 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
8.5 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
4.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
15.0 / 20 |
| Other |
| Temp Fill : |
7.9 / 10 |
| sub-total : |
7.9 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
|
1. Nicely designed, simple site.
2. Lots of viewing options.
1. Video quality could be improved a little.
2. Not enough to see!
3. Videos can get boring after a couple.
"Angels of Porn offers up hardcore sex action, but that's about it." |
|
|
Ahh, Angels of Porn is the site du jour for today. Scroll to the bottom of the tour page, and you'll see exactly why these girls are angels... pic after pic of lovely BJ action! Without much text to on (besides sales pitches, and text meant to turn us on), I'd have to guess this looks like a pretty standard first-person hardcore reality site of some kind.
Logging in, it's not so much first-person, just hardcore reality videos in general. The member's area is surprisingly simple when compared to the tour area. Basically they offer up links to the episodes, grouped into sets of five. So basically since they have 10 sets (going back to 2nd grade math here), and the last one isn't full yet, they have just under 50 actual videos. Since the only photos they offer appear to be screen caps, I'll go out on a limb early here that there isn't enough content! With a lot of the other reality sites we've looked at, you at least got access to other sites in the network, but here you can Angels of Porn and that's it.
Anyhow, on to the videos, that is why we're here after all. Each video is broken down into clips, and they also have the option to watch the whole thing (nice to have both options!). Each clip has both an MPG and a Windows Media version to watch, with no noticeable difference between the two. The video quality is ok, but nothing special. The video is a standard 320x240, encoded around 500kbps. My main problem with it was that it wasn't very crisp-looking. I'm not sure if it's the video camera, or something lost in the encoding process, but it's not as clear as I'd like it to be. The other problem for me is with the interview before the fuck, it seems rather scripted as you hear the same questions, in the same order, again and again. I didn't get a chance to see all the videos, but the ones I did watch were all pretty similar. The interviewer then "steps away" and lets the two fuck and suck for a while. Each scene I watched was right around the 30 minute mark total, which is good.
The rest of their site is basically filled with third party feeds, which they seem to put more of an emphasis on that other sites do. They have a poll up now, wondering which of the other "video selections" you like most. Personally I'd rather see twice as much original content, and no feeds. Still, there are some big names here if you want to check them out (Hustler, Max Hardcore, Sweet Loads, just to name a few). The only other thing of interest here is the old Angels of Porn section which is mixed in with the feed. In general, these are much more softcore, and of lesser quality than the stuff they have now. They must have had a different site earlier and decided to change directions, and didn't want to throw the content away or something.
Anyhow, overall it's all pretty basic. I would have enjoyed it more if there was more going on in the videos I think. Looking at as much porn as I do, I just need something fresh other than the standard suck and fuck. Without access to any other sites, $25 seems a bit much to charge here. Watch out, too, because if you join by the trial, you get rebilled at $30 a month instead, which to me makes the site really not worth it. Judging by the date of their last update (six days ago), I'd guess they update weekly. All of this adds up to just an ok site for me overall. There are a few things I'd like to fix (more content, a new angle on the content, less costly, etc.) before I'd recommend it.
| 1st Follow-Up Review |
Review: 11-24-04 |
Well, the site looks much the same here as last time. They have been growing at a steady pace which is always good. Another big plus now is that they give you access to their network of sites with your membership. Although most of the sites aren't as good as Angels of Porn, they do provide for some extra content to keep you busy.
Overall, still not a bad site for me. The extra size helps a bit, as does the network access. It's still a little less entertaining for me for some reason, but if you're looking for young girls doing hardcore videos there's really nothing wrong with these at all!
Score increased from 77.7 to 79.9.
|
