|
Content
|
| Quality : |
16.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
13.5 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
13.5 / 15 |
| Updates : |
8.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
5.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
58.5 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
8.0 / 10 |
| Features : |
3.0 / 05 |
| Design : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
14.5 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
3.5 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
7.0 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
| Editor: Spencer |
Initial Review: 10-04-06 |
|
1. Decent-sized collection.
2. Updates come often.
3. Content is exclusive of course.
1. Interaction is lacking a bit (temporarily?)
2. Video quality needs work.
3. A bit more expensive than usual.
"A hot chick with some nice content, and just a few small issues to work through." |
|
|
Angelique of Angelique XXX has been on the net for quite some time (1998 according to her front page actually). She's definitely into sex and it shows on her site with lots of various men and women getting a taste of Angelique. I assume we'll have a decent amount of content inside her site since she's been online for quite a while, and you also get access to the 4 Real Amateurs network of sites as well. It'll cost you $25 a month to get inside the site which is a little on the expensive side, but not too awful.
The goods:
- Good-sized site. With the number of videos topping 100 and the photo galleries closing in on 400, there's a decent amount of content up for a solo site. Her regular updates definitely help keep the numbers up as well.
- Updates come often. They're not very consistent on a schedule or anything, but they end up coming an average of every few days which keeps the site growing quite regularly. Sometimes you'll wait as much as a week, and sometimes she'll have new stuff up every day in a row - you just never know.
- Content is exclusive of course. I'm guessing her boyfriend shoots most of it, but as with any amateur site all the content is exclusive. The only place you may see it elsewhere is if she shoots with another webgirl.
The bads:
- Interaction could be slightly better. She has the basics in place with a diary and camshows. The diary usually rolls along great with daily updates, but we're at about two or more weeks now without a post. On top of that, her schedule only shows one upcoming member's chat, which I'm not even sure if that's a camshow or not (and it doesn't tell you which system she'll be on since she links to more than one). Her Housecamz setup only had one of four cams running, on which no one was there.
- Video quality needs work. The specs vary a bit from one clip to the next, but generally you don't get too far above 500kbps which is disappointing. The pictures look nice, so she just needs to bump up the video quality to get back to what we're normally seeing these days.
Conclusion:
She runs a decent site here, though it's not without faults as well. A few of the problems may be temporary with no cam shows scheduled and the missing diary entries, but others like the slightly higher price tag and lagging video quality are here to stay for now. In the end though, she offers up quite a bit of content and it's updated pretty often. If those few small issues could be taken care of, she'd be in the top group of amateur sites out there for now I'm sure.
|
