OFFICIAL
79.0
pretty good |
|
Content
|
| Quality : |
17.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
13.0 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
13.0 / 15 |
| Updates : |
7.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
5.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
58.0 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
8.0 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
14.0 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
3.5 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
7.0 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
|
1. Nice looking content.
2. All exclusive.
1. Pictures are a little small.
2. Could use some better navigation.
3. Too expensive.
"I don't know where these girls are from, but normal chicks don't love cum this much!" |
|
|
Looking for a fun place to check out? How about a place where "nice girls come to swallow cum?" Have I got a site for you, then! ;-) While I first figured that Amateur Allure would be a typical solo amateur girls site, I guess they also focus on blowjobs and cumshots (which isn't a bad thing for me). There's not really a whole lot of talk about what the site offers unfortunately, so you're left to figure it out for yourself.
The site is very simple all around, sticking only to the basics. The layout and graphics are good, except for their logo which has a horrible drop shadow on it that makes it near impossible to read. Membership is a little high at $29 a month, so I'm hoping the content makes up for that. They don't really mention anywhere if the content is exclusive or not, although one slogan of "original oral content" gives me hope.
I went to the updates first, which only listed some models there without any updates info. There's no mention of new galleries, or of any dates, which is what I was hoping to see. If you go to the "girls" link, you see the exact same layout. There's only six models per page, which leads to a lot of page clicking (annoying!). They give a thumb preview and a very brief description of 1-2 sentences. You then pick a model to go to her page. Along the sides are the image "galleries" which are actually just pages of a gallery from the set. It looks like they usually just do one set of each girl. In the middle are the video clips. Not all models have both images and video clips for some reason.
Pictures generally look pretty nice but are too small for my liking. 650x432 seems to be the only dimension they use all around (changing, of course, depending on the orientation of the photo). Scenes are well-lit and colorful, which is a nice change from most amateur photography. I don't know where he gets the girls, but they're generally pretty cute. The one thing that I missed was nudity, as there's less than I thought there would be. The girls always end up getting a mouthful of cum, but they're clothed more often than not for some reason. Show us the boobies and butts dammit!
The videos look good as well. They are offered only in Quicktime format, but surprisingly have a download option in addition to streaming in your browser. The specs don't sound good compared to how the video looks, so I won't even mention them. The one thing that was missing was a full video file since all they offer are clips. But otherwise the video was a great addition with the same quality you saw in the photos, without the size problems :)
As far as extras go, there are none. About the only things that come close are the friends section, and the store (which will sell DVD's of their videos, but isn't open yet). I really wish they posted an update schedule, as that will make or break this site. The closest thing I could find was on their tour where they mention a minimum of 52 new scenes a year (a.k.a. once a week). I feel the price of the site hurts them the most. What they have is good to look at, and entertaining, but whether it's worth almost $30 a month is another story. There's cheaper sites out there both in the oral and video niches. I guess it comes down to your personal likes or dislikes of the content. The site is pretty cool, but the price isn't.
| 1st Follow-Up Review |
Review: 12-30-05 |
Well growth seems to be the main change here, which isn't necessarily a bad thing. Only nine new girls have come up, but when you look at all the content each one has it's better than it sounds. I was surprised that the pictures were still as reported last time, but the rest of the content looks as good as I remember also. I wish there was more to get into, but there's just not a ton new here. The original review stands still today, and it's still a decent join.
Score increased from 78.9 to 79.0.
|
