OFFICIAL
79.9
pretty good |
|
Content
|
| Quality : |
17.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
13.5 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
13.0 / 15 |
| Updates : |
8.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Download : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
56.5 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
8.0 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
4.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
14.5 / 20 |
| Other |
| Temp Fill : |
7.9 / 10 |
| sub-total : |
7.9 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria
|
|
| Editor: Spencer |
Initial Review: 02-06-07 |
|
1. Sites look nice.
2. A good amount of content up.
3. Quality can be good.
1. Quality varies a lot.
2. Getting around could be easier.
3. Mostly non-exclusive content.
"Overall it was just fine for me with some decent content and a decent price." |
|
|
What a great name for a site. It's like, "I wonder if A Lot Of Models has a lot of models?" Probably so, you'd think. They do have a clean-looking tour with some pretty standard looking solo content. They say they aim for younger girls (18-21), seem to update all five weekdays with something new, and have a very wide range of content from the looks of it. They don't mention anything about exclusivity, and my guess is that it might not be exclusive, though I can't really be sure. Membership is $25 a month, and goes down to $20 a month on the first rebill and thereafter.
The goods:
- Sites look nice. It's simple, but clean, and they did enough to spruce it up so it doesn't look crappy too. That's not to say it's the easiest site to get around, but at least it looks good and isn't too terribly cluttered.
- A good amount of content up. It's hard to get a solid count here since there's no easy way to go about it, but they definitely have over 200 videos, and even more photosets online than that.
- Quality can be good. Depending on where the photosets come from, they can look decent usually. Once in a while they won't quite be up to par, but I wouldn't say that's the norm. Videos were the same, though the newer ones definitely look better than the older ones.
The bads:
- Quality varies a lot. There's just too many photographers in the studio it seems (kind of like when there are too many cooks in the kitchen). Each set varies quite a bit from one to the other, so you never really know what you're going to get.
- Getting around could be easier. They break things up into too many different categories for my liking. I wouldn't mind a master model's list, a master content list in chronological order, and maybe a nice search feature in addition to what they've already got here.
- Mostly non-exclusive content. They do separate the exclusive material out at least, so it's easy to find. However, it's a pretty small section of the site it seems. So I guess that explains why all the content varies so much :)
Conclusion:
Overall it's not too bad of a site. The biggest problems come in the form of inconsistent and non-exclusive content. Otherwise, they've got a lot to see, and they update pretty often as well. It's not exactly huge like some of the bigger non-exclusive content sites out there, but they're doing okay for now.
|
